The proposal, part of a broader initiative titled “Measures to Enhance the Socio-Economic Development of Andijan Region and Improve the Business Environment”, outlines the construction of two residential complexes (20 and 16 stories high) on the vacated land, with an estimated investment of $90 million.
Additionally, the Andijan regional administration plans to redevelop a 10.7-hectare portion of the Alisher Navoi Park to establish the Andijon City business hub. The site will feature 19 residential buildings of 18 stories and seven skyscrapers exceeding 28 stories.
The administration justified the relocation, citing the construction of a nearby bridge on Babur Avenue, which will partially obscure the statue’s current location. The bridge, expected to enhance daily commutes for thousands of residents, necessitated discussions about the monument's future.
Economist Otabek Bakirov compared the proposal to relocating the iconic Amir Temur statue in Tashkent, calling it an ill-conceived plan. “It is like dismantling Amir Temur’s statue from the heart of Tashkent to build residential towers in its place,” Bakirov said. He also criticized the potential commercialization of Andijan’s historical and cultural spaces, likening Alisher Navoi Park to Tashkent’s National Park in significance.
Journalist Shuhrat Shokirjonov echoed similar concerns, emphasizing the need for legal protections to preserve parks and public spaces in urban centers.
The Andijan regional administration defended the relocation, asserting that the move was part of a comprehensive plan to honor Babur’s legacy. The new location at “Registon” square in the historic “Old City” area will incorporate elements celebrating Uzbek history, transforming the square into a vibrant cultural site.
“The current square will be repurposed into a modern complex featuring a ‘Savdo Mall,’ entertainment centers, offices, and service-oriented facilities. Contrary to public speculation, residential housing is not planned for this site,” the administration clarified.
This is not the first time urban redevelopment has sparked controversy in Uzbekistan. A similar incident occurred in Ferghana, where a 2-hectare lake was designated for commercial development. Public protests eventually led to the reversal of the regional governor’s decision.
