The incident that sparked outrage

A video circulated on social media showed Dustov, frustrated after waiting in line for hours at a gas station only for it to close, demonstrating his anger by pointing to his worn-out shoes. The footage went viral, resonating with many who share similar frustrations over gas shortages.

On December 31, it was revealed through court documents that the Bektemir District Court had sentenced Dustov to 15 days in administrative detention on December 26 for "minor hooliganism." The news has provoked widespread discontent among the public and activists, who see the punishment as an attempt to silence dissent rather than address the root issues.

Criticism from activists and experts

Economist and blogger Otabek Bakirov emphasized the importance of fair treatment, suggesting that Dustov should be released under a guarantee from local councils or community representatives. He stressed that compassion and fairness are crucial for a government that aspires to uphold human dignity.

Bakirov also warned that many citizens could find themselves in Dustov's position due to ongoing energy shortages and called on energy officials to provide clear and transparent updates to the public.

Lawyer and blogger Khushnudbek Khudoyberdiev criticized the inconsistency in the justice system. He pointed out how ordinary citizens are punished for minor grievances while officials escape accountability with mere apologies.

“When people feel justice, they endure many hardships patiently,” Khudoyberdiev stated. “But when they sense injustice at every turn, the strain on society becomes unbearable.”

Calls for change

Former MP and environmental advisor Rasul Kusherbayev described the incident as a sign of intolerance toward criticism. He called for a more open-minded approach, urging officials to address public grievances with empathy and understanding.

Journalist Muhrim Azamkhojayev questioned the logic behind Dustov’s detention. He noted, “Detaining this man for 15 days will not solve Uzbekistan’s energy problems. Citizens speaking out about these issues does not make them disappear. It is by addressing these concerns openly that progress has been made in recent years.”

Legal and procedural concerns

According to human rights activist Abdurakhmon Tashanov, as of January 1, Dustov was not in the "Panelny" detention facility where administrative detainees are usually held. Instead, he had been taken to the Tashkent City Police Department for questioning.

Tashanov reported that he and a volunteer lawyer visited the Panelny facility but were told that Dustov was being held at the police department. The reasons for his transfer and continued detention remain unclear. Currently, three volunteer lawyers are working on his case, with more supporters joining.

Public reaction

The public outrage over Dustov’s detention shows a broader dissatisfaction with how authorities handle criticism and dissent. Many see this as an overreach of power that undermines trust in the government.

Kun.uz reached out to the Tashkent City Police Department for an official comment but has yet to receive a response.